Camerarace

90% of those who purchase this camera do not do so with the assistance of DPReview as a shopping guide. For what the 6D2 has to offer, it will be more than enough for the vast majority of individuals, with the exception of those who need the highest possible quality at any cost. These individuals are willing to spend whatever it takes to have the best, and as we all know, if you want the best, you must be willing to pay for it. In the test scenario, the lens used is indicated for each camera we’ve utilized in the scene.

First and foremost, I want ff for lesser depth of field while using the 35mm viewpoint of the provided lens. Of course, the 6dii exceeded all expectations in that situation. Second, I was looking for a decent low-light noise performance. My concerns were unfounded since the camera performed above and beyond. I’ve taken it all the way up to 10,000 iso, which is more severe than usual, however I was astonished by how well they turned out..

Canon 80D, on the other hand, is equipped with a 24.0MP APS-C (22.5 x 15 mm) CMOS sensor and a DIGIC 6 processor. Before we get into our more in-depth comparison of the Canon 6D MII and Canon 80D, let’s take a quick glance at the primary characteristics of each camera. In addition, there is Anti-Flicker technology, which identifies the frequency of the flicker and timings images so that they are captured even if the effect on exposure and color is minor, according to the manufacturer. Furthermore, the Canon 80D features 45 AF points, which makes it more effective at tracking down objects that are spread throughout the frame.

There is a large range of both lenses and accessories available, so photographers will have plenty of options. Both cameras include weather sealing, which means that photographers won’t have to stop shooting when the rain begins to fall. Apart from that, both models are equipped with Wi-Fi, which makes it easier to transmit photographs to smart devices. However, only the 6D MkII is equipped with GPS, which is a handy feature for landscape photographers who want to chart their position for future reference. Finally, when it comes to the construction characteristics, both cameras have a single SDmemory card slot.

They made some progress in that area with the MKIV, but they’ve lost me completely now. I’m keeping my MKIII, but I’m thinking about getting rid of it and the $5k in lenses. Furthermore, the MKIV’s lack of adequate 4K support is detrimental; my phone already supports this resolution, and it is already considered standard. As a result, I’m now faced with the decision of whether to upgrade from my 60D to an 80D or to a 6DmkII.

The problem is that none of these replies are helpful. Yes, the MKII has a somewhat narrow range of acceptable focus points, but because I only use the center one from the original, the narrow range is still a significant improvement. The low ISO dynamic range (DR) is not important to me; but, the high ISO is, and I haven’t seen any solid comparisons of the 6D and 6D II in real-world situations with low light.

Is there any new information on the auto-focusing performance of the viewfinder with the 80d? When all points are active during servo focusing in auto mode, it was really awful in the dpr evaluation with auto mode. What about focussing on a small or huge zone of interest? With the exception of Canon’s handicap, the 77d seems to be a step forward over the 80d in terms of live view and view finder focussing, thanks to the upgraded CPU. It is also somewhat sharper than the 80d when compared in the studio, and it has the added benefit of being smaller and lighter in weight.

canon 6d mark ii

Very comparable IQ, lower file sizes (yeah, I’ve come to the conclusion that the additional 6 MP from the 6DMII is completely insignificant). If you know how to utilize the 6D’s autofocus system, it may be fairly effective for taking photographs. If you absolutely must have video, the 6DMII would be the obvious pick; if you don’t, save your money and purchase a 6D instead. It’s an excellent idea to rent two cameras, as you said. It’s possible that a field test will be necessary.

canon 6d mark ii

You seem to have been around the Camera block a couple of times already. Finally, FF is FF, and if you ask anybody who has a 6D and has purchased the 6D2, they will tell you that the upgrade is well worth the money. The net price difference of $400 between what I paid for the 6D2 ($1000) and the $600 I received from the sale of my two-year-old 80D seemed to be a realistic comparison. When you make a purchase after clicking on one of the affiliate links on this site, APOTELYT.com may get a commission.

canon 6d mark ii

The 6D Mark II has a smaller overall footprint than most other APS-C DSLRs, yet it is packed with a slew of innovative technologies. It has a vari-angle rear touchscreen, which is ideal for using the Canon’s Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View mode, which is very quick. However, there is one aspect of the Canon 80D that I do not really enjoy: the 4K recording capability. I’m not shocked by this since there aren’t many other competitors in this price range that offer this function; nonetheless, I believe that the manufacturer could have done a better job given that this is one of the most popular video features right now.

canon 6d mark ii

Bir cevap yazın

E-posta hesabınız yayımlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir